By now most of you will be aware of
the new regulations governing experimental procedures introduced by the UK
research councils (and following on from similar changes already applied in
Europe and the USA). For those of us conducting behavioural, social and
cognitive neuroscience studies on human participants it will represent a major
change in the way we conduct our experiments, treat our participants, collect
our data, and develop our scientific models. The major changes have been
introduced to ensure that behavioural and neuroscience research using human
participants complies with a mixture of research council developments on the
importance of social impact of funded research and the recent EU Court of Human
Rights declarations on the rights and civil liberties of individuals as
extended to human participants in experimental procedures.
The most obvious change is the
introduction of regulations governing the nature and impact of distraction
activities in psychological experiments. In an attempt to spread the social and
economic impact of biological science research to activities that take place in
the experimental procedure itself, experimenters will no longer have a free
choice of distractor tasks (e.g. in memory experiments) or inter-task
activities to present to their participants. Researchers will no longer be able
to ask their participants to count backwards in threes to prevent rehearsal of
learned material. Instead, participants must engage in an activity that represents
a significant social or economic contribution. The ESRC website provides a
number of examples of the socially and economically inclusive distractor tasks
that can now be deployed, many of which are designed to directly benefit the
institution in which the research is being conducted. These include asking
participants to empty waste bins in faculty offices, mark first year lab
reports, prepare sandwiches for senior management luncheon meetings, and chair
student misconduct tribunals. Participants with specific vocational skills can
be asked to use those skills during experimental distraction tasks, including
fixing laboratory plumbing, vacuuming carpets, cooking lunch for university
research employees/technicians (but not
for postgraduate research students), etc. During inter-trial intervals participants
educated to FE level should be urged to teach 50-min Level 1 and Level 2
undergraduate student seminars, and to write draft exam papers for finals
resits. Given the dismay expressed by many researchers to these fundamental
changes in research protocols, RCUK has expressed regret at not including
behavioural and social science researchers in the consultation process for
these changes, but confirms that discussions with Russell Group
Vice-Chancellors proved to be very constructive and Vice-Chancellors were said
to be unanimously supportive of the new changes.
However, the major change to research
council approved experimental procedures results from recent changes to human
rights legislation. No longer can participants be coerced to ‘respond as
quickly as possible’ in reaction time and related studies nor can they be given
a fixed time in which to recall previously learned material in memory-related
experiments. According to the legislation all participants “…must be treated
with equality and respect in such a way as to allow the individual to fully
contemplate the various stimulus and response choice options available to them
before executing a response – a response which in many cases may be final and
irrevocable within the confines of the experimental procedure”. This, of
course, will have major implications for many experimental procedures,
including choice reaction-time studies, Implicit Association Tests, many
lexical decision tasks, as well as response bias training procedures and
homophone ambiguity tasks.
Of this latter group of changes,
perhaps the one that will have the greatest impact on researchers is the
abolition of the fixed recall period in memory tasks. In future all
participants will be allowed as much time as they require to recall
prior-learned material and word lists. Research council guidelines now specify
that participants in such studies should be given the opportunity to recall
experimental material “…over as extended a time period as is necessary and
befits the status of the participant as a respected and valued member of
society”. The minimum recall time now recommended by RCUK is one week, timed
from the end of the learning phase of the study. These guidelines state that
all participants must be given a stamped addressed envelop when leaving the
laboratory so that they can jot down any material recalled in the week
following the experiment and submit that material to the experimenter for
proper inclusion in the study analysis. Similarly, participants can no longer
be allocated to different experimental conditions on a random basis without
prior consultation. All participants must be given an informed overview of each
experimental condition and allowed a free choice of the condition in which they
wish to participate. The participant also has the right to change this choice
at any time after the study has begun, and also will have the choice to sample
each of the conditions before making a decision on which group to participate
in. Researchers in individual institutions are encouraged to hold regular
‘fairs’ for participants that advertise and provide examples of the various
experimental conditions in their studies and which will allow participants to
make a fully informed choice of the experimental conditions in which they would
like to participate. Placebo conditions must now be clearly labeled as such for
the participant and cake provided for the participant at the end of a placebo
procedure to compensate for the lack of a psychologically/biologically potent
component in the experimental condition. Also, any procedures that involve
deception must be approved by a locally-appointed panel of civil rights legal
advisors – at least one of whom must be a fully qualified and experienced
teacher of qualitative methods.
For your information, full details of
these changes to the regulations governing experimental procedures in the
behavioural and social sciences can be found at http://bit.ly/HeZGp7.
Nice spoof--though I do think that cake at the end of a placebo procedure is a great idea!
ReplyDelete