Most academics and researchers now rely on their undergraduate students’
final year projects as an important research resource. These projects provide
opportunities to test out new procedures, methodologies and theories at
relatively low cost to the researcher. Nevertheless, no matter how much you
might closely supervise this research there is still a nagging doubt that you
have delegated important research to a relatively inexperienced individual. How
do you decide whether the research they have delivered is worthy of writing up
and publishing? Below is a flow-chart that allows the inexperienced junior
lecturer to make some decisions about publishing an undergraduate project[1].
[1] This flow-chart is designed to ensure optimal career development for
junior and mid-career academics and researchers.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYes!
ReplyDeleteBut before publishing, get a good editor:
"their undergraduate students’ final year projects" = "the ... projects of their undergraduate STUDENTS" [plural]
"Your Undergraduate Student's Projects?" = "the projects of your undergraduate STUDENT" [singular]
Enter your comment... Cheap and best projects I have
ReplyDeleteرادیو جوان
ReplyDelete